Five Steps to Embed Growth Mindset Practices into Learning Culture

Getting Smart

By Rebecca Midles and Rashawn Caruthers July 15, 2021

Growth Mindset in Classroom

ShareTweetSharePin

Remember coming in after recess in elementary to a 20-question math quiz? If you were done first, you were smart. If it looked easy for you, you were also smart. Over the years, authentic assessment and personalized learning have started to change this idea of “smart”. When combined with Carol Dweck’s research on growth mindset, learners embrace growth, openness, and innovative ideas. How we provide feedback as educators and parents can send a message about not only how we see the learning, but the learner as well.

In order to create a learning culture that embraces growth mindset one must create a safe learning environment that honors all learners, experiences and cultures; teach learners the basics of learning science so they better understand conditions, context and thriving; and practice giving feedback in thoughtful ways.

Due to systemic inequities in the education system, traditionally underserved populations are more likely to have a fixed mindset. According to a recent Brookings Report, “Traditionally underserved students – including students in poverty, English learners, Hispanics, and African-American students – are less likely to hold a growth mindset.” Mindset, like intelligence, is not stagnant and learners can move from a fixed to growth mindset with the right support.

For students to thrive, or as Gholdy Muhammad would say, have their genius seen, both teachers and students have to constantly practice having a growth mindset. Some students may arrive knowing exactly who they are and what’s possible, while others will need more support to imagine a reality that changes their trajectory for the better. It is critical that teachers don’t under expect what students can do and, to address the harm caused by systemic racial inequities in education, educators need to believe that their historically underrepresented students can achieve the same rigorous content as their dominant-culture peers.

Building a growth mindset culture does not stop at awareness. Implementing the following strategies and tools for learners provides them access to feel empowered in their learning and to be able to impact their growth.

1. Trust, Nurture Relationships

Trust and relationships begin to develop when students are heard, and students–particularly those that have experienced personal and/or generational trauma–need trusting relationships to feel comfortable in a learning culture. While designing, consider how students will know that they’re being heard. This builds relationships and makes space for trust to be earned and praise to be received. Educators can use the “Four Elements of Trust” and be intentional in their approach. The Four Elements are consistency, compassion, competence, and communication.

Select or create mechanisms to capture student voice on a daily basis and foster collaboration. Consider how you will learn and gather insights to how students feel about themselves and how they learned or didn’t on a particular day. When students communicate that they don’t feel smart, that they struggled, or that they don’t feel as capable as their peers, intentional structures can be implemented or activated to change the mindset from fixed to growth. When learners are validated and affirmed, they are more likely to feel seen, valued for their contributions, and ready to learn. When learner ideas are at the center of instruction, teachers signal that they respect and value students’ thinking.

2. The Brain and How Learning Works

Learners need to learn about the brain and how it works. This can include a phased approach to teaching the science, but the most important part is explicitly teaching that the brain is not fixed at birth and that it changes and grows (this idea is often referred to as neuroplasticity). Understanding how long-term learning happens and the role stress, anxiety and emotion play in this process helps learners better understand how their body works, their stages of development and how they can impact their own learning.

There are many resources to use and stories to share that support the effort of ‘rewiring’ your brain. The MindUP Curriculum provides K-8 resources for How Your Brain Works. (Example video for grades 3-5). For parent support in teaching about the brain, MindsetWorks refers to this work as Brainology and Growing Early Mindsets (GEM) and more can be found on their website.

3. Mindsets and Difference Between Growth and Fixed

Teaching the difference between a fixed mindset and a growth mindset is a common first step for people seeking to build a learning culture, but this phase will often reach more students more deeply when they first learn about the science of how we learn, as discussed in phase two above.

MindsetWorks provides many resources for teaching about mindsets. The Mindset Continuum chart identifies mixed mindsets and begins to show the progression and provides identifiers for growth. There are a number of common misconceptions about learning cultures, and it is worth getting familiar with a few of the many recent articles addressing them.

4. Feedback and the Power of Praise

Providing feedback, and especially praise, can shape a learner’s inner voice, as the feedback we give sets the tone for how we see learning and for how students see themselves as learners.

While some learners are instantly motivated by hearing what a good job they did, others may perceive it as being inauthentic because a relationship of trust hasn’t been established. When praise isn’t immediately welcomed, it can feel as though the student is being disrespectful or stubborn, but it could also simply be that the student doesn’t feel worthy of the praise because of low or vacant self-esteem. According to to Dr. Joy Degruy, “Individuals arrive at their self-esteem: first, as a result of the appraisals of the significant others in their lives; later, as a result of having their contributions appropriately recognized; and finally, as a result of the meaningfulness of their own lives.”

Praise must be implemented in three phases with the most important step being the first, relationship building. Learners, especially black and brown learners, are sometimes made to feel submissive which makes it difficult to receive and appreciate praise. Often when praise is given, especially in the larger societal context, it’s for skills unrelated to academics which continues to cement that praise for being “smart” is not for them and can’t be true.

If we praise the process when productive struggles have occurred, then we are saying this is learning and learning is not easy.  In our opening example of math quizzes, what we choose to praise sends a message. Instead of noting when things were quick/easy we can call out productive struggles instead.

Teachers can practice adding to their repertoire of providing feedback and giving praise. One way to do this can be as simple as reviewing suggested sentence stems or praise like the ones provided by Mindset Works and reviewing them to help grow a feedback toolkit of phrases.

5. Using Your Inner Voice, Self-Talk

To change a mindset, learners need tools to reframe this voice and to build productive self-talk as they approach challenges. It is a good start to be aware of a fixed mindset or to even be aware of negative self-talk, but it is necessary to also provide strategies and tools to support growth. Teaching strategies facilitates all learners to believe in themselves and their ability to grow their intelligence.

A place to start is through mindful observations of your learners that are more like running records than a quick assumption. Kristine Mraz and Christine Hertz Hausman expand on this further in their book, A Mindset for Learning, with a chart of observable behaviors of learners and the examples of self-talk that may be occurring. They recommend noticing groups of learners that may not start right away, or get stuck or stalled. To observe which learners may only try once or perseverate on a small task. These observations will help prepare future discussions and conferring opportunities where learners reflect on a recent struggle and how they felt during that process.

You could also generate a class list by collecting examples of nonproductive self-talk and brainstorm alternatives. See an example of this practice below. Classmates can then practice this with a trusted partner, or as trust and the culture grows this list can be posted for peers to support one another. When peer to peer language changes, the learning environment changes.

By creating a student culture of trust, respect and agency and consistently practicing growth mindset thinking, students will feel accepted in their learning community and will be ready to take on new learning challenges and encourage their learning community to do the same.

Rebecca MidlesRebecca Midles is the Vice President of Learning Design at Getting Smart and is an innovator in competency education and personalized learning with over twenty years of experience as teacher, administrator, board member, consultant and parent. Follow her on Twitter at @akrebecca.

Rashawn CaruthersRashawn “Shawnee” Caruthers is the Director of Learner Experience at Getting Smart and is a longtime educator with a background in marketing, journalism and advertising. She has a particular interest in CTE, words and empowering young people to control their own narrative.

Loving the Skin They’re In: Race-Based Affinity Groups for the Youngest Learners

NAIS

August 18, 2020

By Shanon L. Connor and Julie ParsonsIt’s critically important for young students of color to feel uplifted, confident, and to have a sense of self. More than a decade ago, The Gordon School (RI) created race-based affinity groups—Common Ground—as spaces where children could be their authentic selves without risking judgment. Forty-three percent of Gordon’s enrollment is students of color, and 27% of the faculty and staff at Gordon are people of color.

Common Ground supports children of color as they speak freely about the experiences and challenges they face in school. Lower School Common Ground includes children identified by their parents as children of color and aged from first through fourth grade who meet for an hour weekly in eight week seasons. They discuss school issues, form bonds over common experiences, ask questions, and have fun together.

The goals for the students are deeply steeped in the tenets of Louise-Derman Sparks and Julie Olsen Edwards’ 2010 book, Anti-Bias Education for Young Children and Ourselves, among other titles by the authors, to inform the school’s anti-bias and anti-racist practice with young children.

  • Each child will demonstrate self-awareness, confidence, family pride, and positive social identities.
  • Each child will express comfort and joy with human diversity; accurate language for human differences; and deep, caring human connections.
  • Each child will increasingly recognize unfairness, have language to describe unfairness, and understand unfairness hurts.
  • Each child will demonstrate empowerment and the skills to act, with others or alone, against prejudice and/or discriminatory actions.

In March 2018, Common Ground expanded its reach even further. Families and school leaders observed the success of the lower school affinity group program, and they wanted younger students—often siblings of older Common Ground participants—to have an opportunity to play and learn with their peers. Gordon kindergarten teacher Julie Parsons, who started the first affinity groups at Gordon in 2006, worked with Shanon L. Connor, a preschool teacher at Gordon, to launch affinity groups among the youngest learners, the 5- and 6-year-olds.

A Personal Mission

Connor often reflects on her own experiences as an African American growing up in Rhode Island in the 1980s. She wonders how her life would have been different had she been given a chance to grow and thrive in schools that valued who she was. She had a proud, loving family that taught her about her culture, history, and the struggles her ancestors endured, but her time in school was less enriching. She remembers often feeling different or out of place, as if her thoughts, opinions, and life experiences were secondary to the majority.

In 2008, Connor joined Gordon as a preschool teacher. After teaching in Catholic and public schools in Philadelphia and Boston, where she believed she had made a difference in the lives of the majority of her students who were children of color, she was hesitant to change course and teach at a predominantly white, affluent independent school. Choosing to work in this new environment was a difficult decision, but as she became a part of the school community, she knew she could still have an impact on students in her care. She could encourage her preschoolers to love who they are and never be afraid of being their true selves. She could challenge stereotypes and be a role model for all children, but especially, children of color. She knew of the work Gordon was doing with affinity groups and was encouraged by its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Continuing Anti-Racist Work

Children of color continue to face many challenges in today’s world, which doesn’t always respect, accept, or appreciate their identities. Even at Gordon, where multicultural practice is a crucial part of the mission—one that its educators dedicatedly maintain daily—bias and discomfort arise. Students still express sentiments that mirror the data Gordon collected in a 2004 schoolwide assessment that explored the perceptions, attitudes, and expectations informing the educational experience of various racial and ethnic groups at Gordon. The study’s statements from students, families, and educators still ring true:

  • Students still live in two worlds, both of which are critical to them.
  • Students of color still sit alone within some classrooms.
  • Students of color report feeling socially lonely, isolated, and devalued.
  • Students of color feel an innate affinity with one another.
  • The curriculum can drive some racially charged feelings.
  • Race is still used as one element in creating classroom groupings and cross-grade “buddy” pairs.

The assessment led to the creation of Common Ground, which has thrived as a companion to— not a replacement for—sustained anti-racist work in Gordon’s classrooms, playgrounds, strategic planning sessions, and board meetings. Gordon teachers use a shared set of guidelines for multicultural practice to ensure that all students—white students alongside their classmates of color—take an active role in their identity development. This work begins at age 3. Gordon’s white parents and faculty participate in their own race-based affinity groups, as do faculty and parents of color, and they come together throughout the school year in an ongoing series of cross-racial dialogues.

Expanding the Reach

Research shows that young students see and experience racism even if they do not have the words for it. That’s why a play-based curriculum that explicitly affirms racial identity is essential for students of color in predominantly white spaces to feel a sense of belonging. Through books, games, art-making, conversations, and play, Common Ground students learn to love their skin tones, embrace who they are, and vocalize what makes them unique. The youngest children thrive as they joyfully interact with one another and get to know each other in in-depth ways, and fourth graders become leaders for Common Ground, sometimes helping or role modeling for the younger students. They groan when it is time to leave, and they always say the time passes too quickly.

Parsons and Connor understand why they feel this way. This time with their students is unlike the time they have with them in the classroom. During the school day, these students are powerful, strong, and opinionated. In Common Ground, these qualities are nurtured and amplified by the experience of being in the majority and feeling a sense of connection and belonging.

The impact extends into the classrooms, hallways, and playgrounds. For them, there is nothing like observing how elated a young Common Ground student feels when an older student of color they met in the affinity program gives them a hug or a high-five during the school day. Students have a sense of confidence in the classroom and can easily speak to their peers about what Common Ground means to them.

When the COVID-19 pandemic closed their campus in March, older students of color gathered online. Zoom conversations included talking about the protests and how they were taking action. As they plan for the upcoming year in these uncertain times, there’s one thing they know for sure: Holding and creating space for students to gather for Common Ground will be an essential part of their programming. As early childhood educators, they are proud that Common Ground is an evolving space for students.AUTHORJulie Parsons

Julie Parsons is a kindergarten teacher at The Gordon School in East Providence, Rhode Island.
 Shanon L. Connor

Shanon L Connor is a preschool teacher at The Gordon School in East Providence, Rhode Island.

Applying Insights From Neuroscience in the Classroom

Edutopia

A deeper understanding of how the brain works can help teachers plan lessons that reach every student.By Megan CollinsJune 18, 2021

Olav Ahrens Røtne / Unsplash

Understanding, even minimally, how the brain works when it comes to learning can help teachers more effectively educate students. In her recently released book, Uncommon Sense Teaching: Practical Insights in Brain Science to Help Students Learn, Dr. Barbara Oakley and her coauthors provide easy-to-understand explanations of neuroscience concepts and practical tips for how teachers can help students learn more effectively no matter what the content. I recently met with Dr. Oakley and learned about some of the neuroscience concepts on which her book is based, as well as practical advice for how teachers can apply this information in the classroom.

UNDERSTANDING WORKING MEMORY

As explained in Uncommon Sense Teaching, we can think of information as a collection of balls. (Metaphors are a powerful tool to help our brains hold on to information.) Information is kept alive in working memory, a temporary mental storage space, by focusing on or repeating ideas. Students can hold on to only so much information consciously in their working memories. A typical working memory can hold, or work on, only about four balls of information at once. Long-term memory’s ability to hold on to information is just that—longer.

Special education teachers and learning specialists are well aware of the effect that working memory capacity can have on a student’s ability to learn. However, Dr. Oakley and her coauthors noticed that these ideas are often not applied to general classroom teaching practices. “We would like to think that this is common knowledge among all teachers, but, at present, it isn’t,” Dr. Oakley said when I spoke with her. Even in a single class, working memory capacity among students can vary dramatically. For example, students with a lesser-capacity working memory often have trouble completing multistep directions, or they may omit or repeat words when writing a sentence.

“As teachers,” Dr. Oakley told me in our interview, “we need to help kids realize that if you can’t understand something the first time you sit down to try, that doesn’t mean you are some kind of dummy. It just means that you are a member of the human race. Creating neural structures in long-term memory is what levels the playing field, so that a person with a low-capacity working memory can perform just as well as, or even better than, a person with high-capacity working memory.”

Simple teaching techniques such as pausing periodically during a lesson to give students a chance to reread or displaying multistep directions so that students can free up working memory capacity for actual lesson content can show tangible results for those with lesser-capacity working memory.

DECLARATIVE VERSUS PROCEDURAL PATHWAYS TO LEARNING

Similar to differences in working memory capacity, pathways through which we teach and learn knowledge can vary. There are two main pathways the brain uses to deposit new information in long-term memory. The declarative pathway is often thought to involve facts or events. The procedural pathway involves learning complex patterns, such as those found in mathematics, or skills such as typing, tying a shoe, or solving a Rubik’s Cube.

image

“Teachers need to know that both ways of learning are valuable and provide a deeper way for students to understand material,” Dr. Oakley said. “When teachers emphasize only one system of learning, as by forcing students to explain declaratively every step in solving a problem, for example, it can make it more difficult for a student to be a successful overall learner. We are hurting students who learn well procedurally. This type of learning is often difficult or impossible to explain.”

Offering opportunities for both declarative and procedural learning is key. One-minute summaries, where students write down everything they remember immediately following a lesson, or peer teaching, where students work with partners to teach one another facts and information from a lesson, are great ways for students to plug declarative information into long-term memory. Alternatively, teaching through procedural pathways requires the ability to practice, and actual practice of a skill helps automatize the information. Incorporating classroom activities that involve both types of pathways will optimize learning for all students.

FOCUSED VERSUS DIFFUSE MODES OF LEARNING

Another important aspect of brain science is understanding focused versus diffuse modes of thinking. When the brain is in focused mode, working memory is hard at work. It’s making neural connections and building an understanding of the material. Studying for a test, reading a text, or reviewing vocabulary in a foreign language are all examples of the brain working in focused mode.

In diffuse mode, the brain is less focused on the material. Instead, it’s making subconscious connections to the material. Daydreaming while going for a walk or letting your mind wander while taking a shower are examples of the brain in diffuse mode. Optimal learning often involves both focused and diffuse modes of thinking. Teachers can guide students to recognize these two forms of learning. For example, when students study, they can begin to recognize the point at which they become frustrated. That’s the point at which their focused mode is essentially maxed out. Taking brain breaks at this stage will switch their thinking to diffuse mode when neural links can begin to connect. As Dr. Oakley writes in Uncommon Sense Teaching, “Knowing when frustration has just reached a peak, so it’s time to switch to something else or take a break, is a valuable learning meta-skill. It comes in particularly handy on tests, where students often can’t unstick themselves once they become stuck on a problem.”

Dr. Oakley is a passionate educator who wants the best for both teachers and students, and is developing an online course for teachers. “Teachers are heroes,” she told me. “We wrote this book to help them teach even better and to help students excel in the subjects that can be the most difficult to learn.” While many of these strategies may not seem novel to teachers, thinking of them in terms of the neuroscience concepts they employ can guide teachers in making thoughtful, science-based decisions when planning lessons and units.

Edutopia

A deeper understanding of how the brain works can help teachers plan lessons that reach every student.By Megan CollinsJune 18, 2021

Olav Ahrens Røtne / Unsplash

Understanding, even minimally, how the brain works when it comes to learning can help teachers more effectively educate students. In her recently released book, Uncommon Sense Teaching: Practical Insights in Brain Science to Help Students Learn, Dr. Barbara Oakley and her coauthors provide easy-to-understand explanations of neuroscience concepts and practical tips for how teachers can help students learn more effectively no matter what the content. I recently met with Dr. Oakley and learned about some of the neuroscience concepts on which her book is based, as well as practical advice for how teachers can apply this information in the classroom.

UNDERSTANDING WORKING MEMORY

As explained in Uncommon Sense Teaching, we can think of information as a collection of balls. (Metaphors are a powerful tool to help our brains hold on to information.) Information is kept alive in working memory, a temporary mental storage space, by focusing on or repeating ideas. Students can hold on to only so much information consciously in their working memories. A typical working memory can hold, or work on, only about four balls of information at once. Long-term memory’s ability to hold on to information is just that—longer.

Special education teachers and learning specialists are well aware of the effect that working memory capacity can have on a student’s ability to learn. However, Dr. Oakley and her coauthors noticed that these ideas are often not applied to general classroom teaching practices. “We would like to think that this is common knowledge among all teachers, but, at present, it isn’t,” Dr. Oakley said when I spoke with her. Even in a single class, working memory capacity among students can vary dramatically. For example, students with a lesser-capacity working memory often have trouble completing multistep directions, or they may omit or repeat words when writing a sentence.

“As teachers,” Dr. Oakley told me in our interview, “we need to help kids realize that if you can’t understand something the first time you sit down to try, that doesn’t mean you are some kind of dummy. It just means that you are a member of the human race. Creating neural structures in long-term memory is what levels the playing field, so that a person with a low-capacity working memory can perform just as well as, or even better than, a person with high-capacity working memory.”

Simple teaching techniques such as pausing periodically during a lesson to give students a chance to reread or displaying multistep directions so that students can free up working memory capacity for actual lesson content can show tangible results for those with lesser-capacity working memory.

DECLARATIVE VERSUS PROCEDURAL PATHWAYS TO LEARNING

Similar to differences in working memory capacity, pathways through which we teach and learn knowledge can vary. There are two main pathways the brain uses to deposit new information in long-term memory. The declarative pathway is often thought to involve facts or events. The procedural pathway involves learning complex patterns, such as those found in mathematics, or skills such as typing, tying a shoe, or solving a Rubik’s Cube.

image

“Teachers need to know that both ways of learning are valuable and provide a deeper way for students to understand material,” Dr. Oakley said. “When teachers emphasize only one system of learning, as by forcing students to explain declaratively every step in solving a problem, for example, it can make it more difficult for a student to be a successful overall learner. We are hurting students who learn well procedurally. This type of learning is often difficult or impossible to explain.”

Offering opportunities for both declarative and procedural learning is key. One-minute summaries, where students write down everything they remember immediately following a lesson, or peer teaching, where students work with partners to teach one another facts and information from a lesson, are great ways for students to plug declarative information into long-term memory. Alternatively, teaching through procedural pathways requires the ability to practice, and actual practice of a skill helps automatize the information. Incorporating classroom activities that involve both types of pathways will optimize learning for all students.

FOCUSED VERSUS DIFFUSE MODES OF LEARNING

Another important aspect of brain science is understanding focused versus diffuse modes of thinking. When the brain is in focused mode, working memory is hard at work. It’s making neural connections and building an understanding of the material. Studying for a test, reading a text, or reviewing vocabulary in a foreign language are all examples of the brain working in focused mode.

In diffuse mode, the brain is less focused on the material. Instead, it’s making subconscious connections to the material. Daydreaming while going for a walk or letting your mind wander while taking a shower are examples of the brain in diffuse mode. Optimal learning often involves both focused and diffuse modes of thinking. Teachers can guide students to recognize these two forms of learning. For example, when students study, they can begin to recognize the point at which they become frustrated. That’s the point at which their focused mode is essentially maxed out. Taking brain breaks at this stage will switch their thinking to diffuse mode when neural links can begin to connect. As Dr. Oakley writes in Uncommon Sense Teaching, “Knowing when frustration has just reached a peak, so it’s time to switch to something else or take a break, is a valuable learning meta-skill. It comes in particularly handy on tests, where students often can’t unstick themselves once they become stuck on a problem.”

Dr. Oakley is a passionate educator who wants the best for both teachers and students, and is developing an online course for teachers. “Teachers are heroes,” she told me. “We wrote this book to help them teach even better and to help students excel in the subjects that can be the most difficult to learn.” While many of these strategies may not seem novel to teachers, thinking of them in terms of the neuroscience concepts they employ can guide teachers in making thoughtful, science-based decisions when planning lessons and units.